colavorativamente
Created in http://piratepad.net/7WXpbVB4Zx. Pirate Pad proposed in your reasons that make Sinde Obnoxious Law
; Propose
arguments against the law Sinde.
1. Sharing is b ueno
2. Prohibit bad
3 . Censure is a crime ...
4 . Article 44 EC: Article 44.1 English Constitution: "The public authorities shall promote and watch over access to culture, to which all are entitled." Tutelary is to guide, not prohibit.
5 . Everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.
Both the Declaration of Human Rights you as l to English constitution sets out the rights of presumption of innocence, fair trial and the independence of the judiciary from the legislature. Sinde Act establishes a mechanism that eliminates the judicial and legislative independence. Giving the legislature the ability to sentencing by eliminating the rights of presumption of innocence, judicial independence and fair and impartial trial outside the legislature.
6. Spotify in Europe is the second largest source of revenue for record labels http://bitelia.com/2011/02/spotify-segunda-fuente-de-ingresos-para- -stamps the
7. Because in reality, artists, g anan at gigs more now than before http://www.cincodias.com/articulo/sentidos/artistas-ganan-conciertos-discos/20090707cdscdscis_10/ it is clear that a law is only to support an industry that h to give way to new business models.
living musicians playing live. A whole new model that the labels were necessary at the time but that does not stop being an intermediary. Today technological development makes n i necessary such intermediaries, the musician returning to work to live from day to day, playing live, because that's their job. The gra b ation of Discs longer a mere matter of marketing to let people know their music and go to their concerts, i increasingly n necessary hardware, since the CD does not take on the mp3.
8. It's a totally useless and ineffective law, and you can still enter these pages censored simply following a few simple steps: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v HdTtLg_C81k & feature = = player_embedded
9. Censorship on behalf of the English culture when this is the least is pirated.
10. Because it is a law that says "needs" of the American industrial model and not ours, we want , having been created this law by the U.S. http://rvr.linotipo.es/2010/ 12/wikileaks-y-ley-sinde-el-plan-de-eeuu.html thus being a NO-sovereign law.
11. Because piracy and defends them English law, sharing is not and never will, stealing .
12. Why not download for free, totally unfair to pay a fee for it.
13. Article 117 of the English Constitution
- 1. Justice emanates from the people and is administered on behalf of the King by Judges and Magistrates of the Judiciary are independent, irremovable, responsible and subject only to the rule of law
competition to determine whether it's illegal is one of the judges. It also comes in the separation of powers.
14. Because h internet has shown that, if there is money http://1libro1euro.com/1Libro1Euro.html http://alt1040.com/2011/02/un-libro-un-euro-y-una-oportunidad-para-cambiar-el-mundo http://twitter . com / # ! / JuanGomezJurado/status/34588566449299456
15. Because sharing is legal. And been legal if: https: / / www.facua.org / en / sieslegaleslegal / index.php
16. Because Netfix similar offers affordable and Spotif (8-10 $ subscription) and in Spain impossible by the high costs of copyright.
17. Because you can not ask citizens to pay exorbitant and inflated prices while 44% did not reach end of the month: http://www.elmundo.es/mundodinero/2010/11/18/economia / 1290080527.html
18. Because we charge for the same thing twice , besides paying taxes .
19. Because there are cars in which no court has declared illegal ANY links and this bill seeks to bypass these judges.
20.Porque culture is taught and learned more watching downloaded movies and series from the United States that any compulsory education.
21. For the latest move to stop piracy turned out to be completely illegal for the EU: http://www.rtve.es/noticias/20101021/tribunal-ue-declara-ilegal-canon-digital-aplicado-espana/ 363681.shtml
22. For the industry, how it goes, will decay. 1 º seriesyonkis both win? 2 º Why, if that's true, they do not ride your own server? "Someone ever visited http://www.hulu.com/ ? The solution we already have.
23. Because any proxy or VPN navigation breaks this law. Is to stem the tide. Piracy will never end
24. Because the only thing a law is intended to introduce more ineffective is hard.
25. Because users are not pirates or criminals, we are quite simply: Citizens and people.
26. Precisely because the politicians who have passed the law are the least understood of the Internet.
27. Censorship is for dictatorships, Culture belongs to everyone and for all.
28. Because film and music industry needs to adapt to the revolutionary model of the Internet.
2 9. For first came on vinyl, then cassette, then VHS, then on CD, DVD, Blu-ray, it is now time to move on to the Internet. The industry changes, evolves, it has done and what to do, never stop creating .
30. Because the law does not say which .
31. Because not all content is illegal downloads .
32. Because Oh! D ios mine! How were artists and creators before that there IP lobbies? Inconceivable!
33. Because distributors are running out business because they want to, because we have better alternatives in internet https: / / contractor and creators before that there IP lobbies? Inconceivable!
33. Because distributors are running out business because they want to, because we have better alternatives in internet https: / / wuaki.tv / .
wuaki.tv /.
34. Because we have funded these pel í films with grants and receive no benefit , and in many cases we have no right to see works created.
35. Even writers like Rodolfo Martinez are against the law Sinde and he explained in http://www.echoboomers.cl/?p = 423
36 .- Because it is more than pirates impose what you're interested above the opinion of others abusing the power that you have been "loaned" to any discharge.
37. It's harmful for technological advancement, as well as to enhance the topmanta illegal things, reduce sales and lead numerous legal problems, both saturation of courts, as mass claims, etc.
38. It provides a powerful tool that slows development and innovation in the network in Spain. With this law in his hand the next Google will not be English, since it would be closed by the legislature although their business is legal and proven in court years later.
39.Esta indiscriminate censorship law allows, under the guise of copyright, to suspend "preventively" content that does not concern the power / Section Two.
40.Se have been creating new systems that reduce the intermediaries, making products accessible to the public and for the sake of the true creators. Opponents of the progress just looking for an obsolete system by which they get money through tithes and through the work of others.
41. The intricacies of film English and business grants: http://www.elpais.com/articulo/opinion/cine/espanol/bolsillo/contribuyente/elpepuopi/20100112elpepiopi_12/Tes
42. It is supporting a disastrous and outmoded system with false data provided by allegedly corrupt groups, and thus judicially denounced http://todoscontraelcanon.com/index2.php?body = article & id_article = 252
43. " L to s question is i got a copyright system flexible and friendly, today, or within 2 years and spent 20 years fighting each other for it. the end reach it. Demography says, the technology say it, and frankly, employers end up saying it too. Countries to submit this will be the winners, and those who spend the next 20 years fighting for it to finish d NDOS to realize that they were wrong, will have been left behind "final sentence of the documentary "When copyrights are going badly" by musical world personalities, technology and education: http://blog.opinguino.es/2010/04/cuando-los-derechos-de-autor-van-mal/
44 . The copyright system that wants to support this law is far from what they stood for copyright in origin, and the theoretical basis of copyright. http://www.ripremix.com
45 The use of information and communication technologies (known as ICT) have allowed the public access to culture and entertainment. Is a right that the public authorities should seek to provide the right price
46 The legislative changes designed to control the Internet are but a vain attempt to preserve their power derives from the people, authentic illegitimate sovereign power some elites come to an end. No economic interest prevail over the rights of persons
47 The network is uncontrollable by the institutions. Despite efforts they are doing to control the devices (hardware) and software (Software) freedom will find its way becoming vain attempts to put gates to the sea.
48 The traditional media will disappear. They are no longer required the distributors and production companies will soon be dispensable. Any attempt manipulation will be useless.
49Los creators will be paid directly by your customers, both in artistic, scientific or professional as
50 should differentiate those copyright people (the only creative beings) and royalties from multinational corporations, multinational kidnap the artist, who suffers from Stockholm syndrome, thinking that their captor is your friend, when the opposite is true
51 must break the monopoly of the management entities' rights "IP
52 A private interest must yield to the right to culture to entertainment and the common good
53. All are not Internet censorship is not the lack of free information . L Sinde the law is an attack on all people have the Internet or not, affects everyone . A Sinde under law. UP INTERNET FREEDOM, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.
54. Because not everyone has the chance to see all the movies we want, not all sites are large cinemas.
55.Tenemos right to see foreign series, not the crap in this country.
56. Because I watch free movies and series since I was little on TV what's the difference? .
57 .- Because I am a musician, author and want to protect my fundamental right to freedom of creation and dissemination of my work , without having to pay anyone for my own concert .
59.Para we want to buy something first has to attract attention and we must conocerlo.Si have not heard a CD, do not let that is Spotify.Pero comprar.Para "series to see what is there?
60. At this rate we will charge for entering libraries (and try to collect fees to libraries) (but if we pay our taxes) .
61. Will not somebody think of the money collected by the SGAE? Where it ends, I want explanations and clarity.
62. Because it is a lie that watch less movies, listen less movies or read fewer books, on the contrary, culture is much more accessible to all and in all places and it does not hurt anyone, least of all the artists.
63. Because it is embarrassing (if not otherwise), believed to be a 'law' to skip or minimize the decision of the judges, just because the rulings of these cases is not condemn the SGAE and other complaints -> http://sindegate.net/lo-que-sentencian-los-jueces/ . Also one of the pillars of democracy is the separation of powers (Judiciary , legislative and executive) and must prevent their union.
64. Because I love music , movies, books , series and video games.
65. Because my disc library, before it was purchased were downloaded and listened.
66. Because you can not allow artists to live permanently on their past successes. If you want to live, to continue working, and stop collecting 'royalties'.
67. Because if it were not for downloads "pirates" would not have been even half of the concerts I've attended.
68. Because Spain has signed the dec the RACI n or universal human rights and it states in Article 8 .- Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted by the constitution or by law .
69. For est masters fed up with forty major and Spain direct.
70. Because without the Internet would never have met those musicians underground or alternative music that does not appear in major marketing promotions and television. Just those same musicians who claim to defend .
71. For we who have the word, we are surfers, we are citizens, we are legion
72. I would not know all that computer without applying cracks, download and English b ilarme .
73. Because we can not enjoy all the culture if we pay for todo.Pretenden we eat and we live to build our culture at a time?
74. Because Sinde represents companies greedy and unscrupulous and has been influenced by U.S. .
75. Because I love the freedom to love. And sharing is loving .
76. Because thanks to the series in the original version am learning English in Spain and this film does not offer (the majority).
77. Because in Spain we do not Tell. Live foreign series.
78. Because in Spain away channels like CNN + for 24 hours to Big Brother and the "star" of Bethlehem Telecirc are people like Esteban and Jorge Javier Vázquez. If we had a television series and a range of programs and films in terms seriesyonkis not attend.
79. Because being í to a delay to internationalize or n of our culture to find groups music, movies , etc ...
80. Because perpetuate the digital divide between Hispanic and abroad.
8 1. Thanks to internet I have met in my life groups Bedrooms known of them and concerted course after I went to their concerts, it's like to be earning money.
82 For he who feeds him to artists are citizens, and according to several studies, users who download buy more original than those who do not download, and no must bite the hand that feeds you
83. Because it is completely unfair that a person who charges 900 euros a month have to pay as much (or more if you live in a town car and has to use) than one who earns 2,500 euros for a movie in the cinema. Culture is for everyone, including the poor, although it seems they would prefer that we knew or read, as long ago.
84. For the simple fact that "intellectual property" is a farce, and there are many real artists who publish their works under creative commons (copyleft), because after all they have achieved the necessary knowledge to do their work in a society that is the same as going to "consume" it. If someone wants to make money with this very easy, to do a concert, but do not intend to sing in a studio and lie on a couch to wait for it to rain money.
85. Simply because of legal uncertainty that gives this law and because it really does not benefit from all but a few authors unable to accept the social reality of the moment. And they do not understand that the time of copying and middlemen who profit from these is over.
86. Because culture is ultimately a world heritage site. Or some Egyptian pays royalties to the descendants of the artists in charge of the ancient pharaohs?.
87. Because they are the record labels, publishers, producers and distributors who really get rich at the expense of artists and exploit their "intellectual property" often deny leeway for creative freedom.
88. Because what they call theft is actually the best advertising there is. If the songs of an artist is not one of the low internet, no one will then go to your s s concert .
89. Because I love the culture, and the only way, to keep it, is shared
90. Because nobody forbids me to use P2P or torrent to download free software (in my case, the CD of Ubuntu Linux)
91. Because the real purpose of the law is censored because it is useless to reduce piracy.
92. Because you can not make a law that most people reject, and only a few defenders , (the rich who are interested to become even richer) , We, the government, especially .
93. Because it is a blow to the hosting companies English, even above that now operators are "benefit" take away your freedom to us, or those companies .
94. Just hear what was said by Lady Gaga> http://www.tuexperto.com/2010/05/27/lady-gaga-dice-que-no-le-importa-que-pirateen-su- music / or Robbie Williams ... http://goo.gl/PCP93 or Paul McCartney ... http://goo.gl/AxiM1 or Neil Gaiman ... http://goo.gl/5UYyc
95. Because it is the only way this system can change and end this bipartisanship that strangles us and s fi x ia.
96. Because Napster was born 8 years ago, Netflix makes 5 and we still have a business model stagnant, old users do not want and will remain so by law Sinde.
97. Because reality always ends imposing, and the reality is that we can and want to share.
98. Because stifling culture is not a viable plan for a future "democratic" country
99. For the law has only just Sinde with internet entrepreneurs , for large corporations and the detriment of citizens .
100. For a truly free network (like the ProOne www.guifi.net) will be impossible to control the network by economic interests. A decentralized network, not telecom operators, where human beings, years we connect with the world without intermediaries; The future began on Dec. 23 when attacking the websites of political parties in self-defense; The citizens are aware of our power.
0 comments:
Post a Comment