can not possess that which can not be preserved exclusively. It is not end the intellectual property, but converting it to "intellectual rights" to be limited to recognition of creators and their just reward for their work. This right must be compatible with the right of citizens to access to culture and knowledge.
Is it right to wage a battle for the "humanization" of copyright? According to the "Human Development Report, United Nations, is an emerging consensus that intellectual property rights may have gone too far and hinder rather than encourage, innovation and progress.
By introducing intellectual property rights and marketing can end up with the scientific community. Intellectual property rights are exploiting the creativity, but destroying their own source. There are areas of knowledge that, not being economically profitable, do not develop, as is the case of very serious research on diseases of tropical countries, as opposed to a lot of research on cosmetic surgery or diseases of the so-called First World. Priority is given to research drugs that require repeated applications to the patient, their ability to generate higher and sustained income.
In the pharmaceutical industry today, one can say that the technology was developed in response to market pressures and not the needs, let alone those of the weakest.
0 comments:
Post a Comment